After having read through the essay and having studied logical fallacies, you should have a good understanding of how to attack the author's points. It is your task to write a refutation essay that criticizes his essay.
This essays structure will be as follows:Introduction:State the author and title of the essay in question; summarize the essay; move to your thesis (I suggest something like "Even though so and so makes some valid points, the essay contains many errors in argumentation that cause the reader to question its validity.")
Body Paragraphs:Explain what the idea is for each section of the essay in question and explain why his points are wrong. There may be several points in question, so just keep identifying his arguments and explain why they are wrong.
For example:
In the 1st section of the essay Mr. Johnson tries to justify why teaching kids to recycle is misleading by implying that recycling is not "always a benefit to the planet." For an analogy he compares recycling aluminum cans to recycling paper products to try to convince the reader that recycling paper products is not "profitable." However, his argument fails when he does not define the term profit. He wants the reader to understand that no money can be made from recycling paper products. This seems to be how he identifies what is a "benefit." He concludes that recycled paper can be used for a variety of items such as "newsprint, ledger paper, and cardboard boxes." He only implicates that these products are made from bleached pulp which he states pollutes the environment. What he fails to mention is the other benefits that may very well outweigh the pollution cause by the manufacturing of these products. By recycling, even though pollution occurs, perhaps saving thousands of trees in the process in a greater benefit to nature and society by not using "virgin materials." Carried out to that end, this argument then matches his half of his reasoning for the desired recycling of aluminum. Apparently because the Earth will not pay in terms of money, recycling is not a "profitable" enterprise.
Tuesday, January 22, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment